DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Jaguar S-type vs 1999 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar S-type

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–79.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeJaguar
S-typeModelXJ
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,1 s0–100 km/h7,3 s
242 km/hTop speed240 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
276 HPPower284 HP
378 NmTorque375 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank81 lt
16 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
—Average consumption12 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/55 R16 WTyre size235/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4861 mmLength5023 mm
1819 mmWidth1799 mm
1441 mmHeight1345 mm
1795 KgWeight1780 Kg
2909 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Jaguar S-type and 1999 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar S-type leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…