DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Jaguar XJ vs 2000 Jaguar S-type Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar S-type

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

79.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeJaguar
XJModelS-type
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h7,1 s
240 km/hTop speed242 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
284 HPPower276 HP
375 NmTorque378 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
81 ltFuel tank68 lt
17,2 ltUrban consumption16 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
12 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/50 R17Tyre size225/55 R16 W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5023 mmLength4861 mm
1799 mmWidth1819 mm
1345 mmHeight1441 mm
1780 KgWeight1795 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2909 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Jaguar XJ and 2000 Jaguar S-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar S-type leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…