DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Jaguar S-type vs 2004 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW Z3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar S-typeSpecificationBMW Z3
JaguarMakeBMW
S-typeModelZ3
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
4Doors3

Performance

Jaguar S-typeSpecificationBMW Z3
8,5 s0–100 km/h6,0 s
230 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2720 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
207 HPPower231 HP
435 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar S-typeSpecificationBMW Z3
DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank51 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption13,3 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
—Average consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar S-typeSpecificationBMW Z3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/50 R17Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar S-typeSpecificationBMW Z3
4861 mmLength4025 mm
1819 mmWidth1740 mm
1441 mmHeight1306 mm
1722 KgWeight1305 Kg
2909 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Jaguar S-type and 2004 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW Z3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…