DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Jaguar F-type vs 2017 Alpina B3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

92.5–93.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeAlpina
F-typeModelB3
2017Model year2017
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

5,1 s0–100 km/h4,0 s
275 km/hTop speed301 km/h
2995 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
400 HPPower440 HP
460 NmTorque660 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption11,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,5 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
8Gears8 Switch-Tronic
—Tyre size245/30 ZR20; 265/30 ZR20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4482 mmLength4632 mm
1923 mmWidth1811 mm
1308 mmHeight1431 mm
1694 KgWeight1705 Kg
2622 mmWheelbase2810 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Jaguar F-type and 2017 Alpina B3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…