DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Alpina B3 vs 2017 Jaguar F-type Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

93.5–92.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AlpinaMakeJaguar
B3ModelF-type
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

4,1 s0–100 km/h5,1 s
298 km/hTop speed275 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2995 cc
410 HPPower400 HP
600 NmTorque460 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption—
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,9 ltAverage consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
8 Switch-TronicGears8
245/30 ZR20; 265/30 ZR20Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4632 mmLength4482 mm
1811 mmWidth1923 mm
1431 mmHeight1308 mm
1705 KgWeight1694 Kg
2810 mmWheelbase2622 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Alpina B3 and 2017 Jaguar F-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…