DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Jaguar F-type vs 2013 Alpina B3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

90.5–91.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeAlpina
F-typeModelB3
2013Model year2013
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

5,7 s0–100 km/h4,9 s
260 km/hTop speed280 km/h
2995 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
340 HPPower360 HP
450 NmTorque500 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank63 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
245/45 R18; 275/40 R18Tyre size245/40 R18ZR; 265/40 R18ZR
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4470 mmLength4545 mm
1923 mmWidth1817 mm
1308 mmHeight1422 mm
1587 KgWeight1645 Kg
2622 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Jaguar F-type and 2013 Alpina B3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…