DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Alpina B3 vs 2013 Jaguar F-type Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

91.5–90.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AlpinaMakeJaguar
B3ModelF-type
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

4,9 s0–100 km/h5,7 s
280 km/hTop speed260 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2995 cc
360 HPPower340 HP
500 NmTorque450 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank70 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
10,2 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
245/40 R18ZR; 265/40 R18ZRTyre size245/45 R18; 275/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4545 mmLength4470 mm
1817 mmWidth1923 mm
1422 mmHeight1308 mm
1645 KgWeight1587 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2622 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Alpina B3 and 2013 Jaguar F-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…