2017 • Jaguar
F-Pace
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d V6 (300 Hp) 2017Overall Score88.75/100
2017 Jaguar F-Pace vs 2014 Wiesmann Roadster Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2014 • Wiesmann
Roadster
Wiesmann Roadster 3.2i 24V (325 Hp) 2014Overall Score88.5/100
WINNER
Jaguar F-Pace
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
88.75–88.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Jaguar F-PaceSpecificationWiesmann Roadster
JaguarMakeWiesmann
F-PaceModelRoadster
2017Model year2014
SUVBody typeRoadster
5Seats2
5Doors2
Performance
Jaguar F-PaceSpecificationWiesmann Roadster
6,2 s0–100 km/h4,9 s
241 km/hTop speed255 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement3246 cc
300 HPPower325 HP
700 NmTorque350 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Jaguar F-PaceSpecificationWiesmann Roadster
DieselFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,0 ltAverage consumption11 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Jaguar F-PaceSpecificationWiesmann Roadster
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears6
—Tyre size215/50 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Jaguar F-PaceSpecificationWiesmann Roadster
4731 mmLength3860 mm
—Width1750 mm
1652 mmHeight1160 mm
1884 KgWeight1180 Kg
2874 mmWheelbase2990 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Jaguar F-Pace and 2014 Wiesmann Roadster approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jaguar F-Pace leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…