DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Wiesmann Roadster vs 2017 Jaguar F-Pace Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar F-Pace

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

88.5–88.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

WiesmannMakeJaguar
RoadsterModelF-Pace
2014Model year2017
RoadsterBody typeSUV
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

4,9 s0–100 km/h6,2 s
255 km/hTop speed241 km/h
3246 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
325 HPPower300 HP
350 NmTorque700 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption6,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,6 lt
11 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears8
215/50 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3860 mmLength4731 mm
1750 mmWidth—
1160 mmHeight1652 mm
1180 KgWeight1884 Kg
2990 mmWheelbase2874 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Wiesmann Roadster and 2017 Jaguar F-Pace approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar F-Pace leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…