DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Jaguar F-Pace vs 2018 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

80.75–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeAudi
F-PaceModelA3
2016Model year2018
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h7,3 s
209 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
180 HPPower190 HP
430 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16; 225/45 R17; 225/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4731 mmLength4423 mm
—Width1793 mm
1652 mmHeight1409 mm
1665 KgWeight1430 Kg
2874 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Jaguar F-Pace and 2018 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…