DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2018 Audi A3 vs 2016 Jaguar F-Pace Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.5–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeJaguar
A3ModelF-Pace
2018Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
250 km/hTop speed209 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
190 HPPower180 HP
320 NmTorque430 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16; 225/45 R17; 225/40 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4423 mmLength4731 mm
1793 mmWidth—
1409 mmHeight1652 mm
1430 KgWeight1665 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2874 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2018 Audi A3 and 2016 Jaguar F-Pace approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…