DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Chevrolet Classic vs 2004 Isuzu Rodeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Classic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeIsuzu
ClassicModelRodeo
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
141 HPPower131 HP
203 NmTorque195 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank59 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size225/70 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4835 mmLength4277 mm
1760 mmWidth1814 mm
1425 mmHeight1704 mm
1375 KgWeight1690 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2462 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Chevrolet Classic and 2004 Isuzu Rodeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Classic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…