DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs 2004 Chevrolet Classic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Classic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

IsuzuMakeChevrolet
RodeoModelClassic
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,0 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
131 HPPower141 HP
195 NmTorque203 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank54 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
—Average consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/70 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4277 mmLength4835 mm
1814 mmWidth1760 mm
1704 mmHeight1425 mm
1690 KgWeight1375 Kg
2462 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Isuzu Rodeo and 2004 Chevrolet Classic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Classic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…