DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Isuzu MU-X vs 2013 Jaguar XF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Isuzu MU-X

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Isuzu MU-XSpecificationJaguar XF
IsuzuMakeJaguar
MU-XModelXF
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Isuzu MU-XSpecificationJaguar XF
—0–100 km/h8,3 s
0 km/hTop speed237 km/h
2999 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
177 HPPower238 HP
380 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Isuzu MU-XSpecificationJaguar XF
DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank64 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption15,8 lt
7,0 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption10,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Isuzu MU-XSpecificationJaguar XF
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
245/70 R16; 255/65 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Isuzu MU-XSpecificationJaguar XF
4825 mmLength4961 mm
1860 mmWidth1877 mm
1825-1830 mmHeight1460 mm
1985-2025 KgWeight1690 Kg
2845 mmWheelbase2909 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Isuzu MU-X and 2013 Jaguar XF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Isuzu MU-X leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…