DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Ford Ranger vs 2013 Isuzu MU-X Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeIsuzu
RangerModelMU-X
2013Model year2013
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h—
175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3198 ccEngine displacement2999 cc
200 HPPower177 HP
470 NmTorque380 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank65 lt
12,0 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,0 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size245/70 R16; 255/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5359 mmLength4825 mm
1850 mmWidth1860 mm
1815 mmHeight1825-1830 mm
2073 KgWeight1985-2025 Kg
3220 mmWheelbase2845 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Ford Ranger and 2013 Isuzu MU-X approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…