DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Isuzu MU-X vs 2012 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

IsuzuMakeFord
MU-XModelRanger
2013Model year2012
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,3 s
0 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2999 ccEngine displacement3198 cc
177 HPPower200 HP
380 NmTorque470 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank80 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption12,0 lt
7,0 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears6
245/70 R16; 255/65 R17Tyre size255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4825 mmLength5359 mm
1860 mmWidth1850 mm
1825-1830 mmHeight1815 mm
1985-2025 KgWeight2073 Kg
2845 mmWheelbase3220 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Isuzu MU-X and 2012 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…