1998 • Isuzu
Mu
Isuzu Mu 2.8 DT (110 HP) 1998Overall Score61.5/100
1998 Isuzu Mu vs 1998 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Land Rover
Range Rover
Land Rover Range Rover Range 2.5 D (136 Hp) 1998Overall Score61.25/100
WINNER
Isuzu Mu
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
61.5–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Isuzu MuSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
IsuzuMakeLand Rover
MuModelRange Rover
1998Model year1998
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
4Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Isuzu MuSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
—0–100 km/h14,3 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2771 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
110 HPPower136 HP
226 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Isuzu MuSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
DieselFuel typeDiesel
83 ltFuel tank100 lt
—Urban consumption12,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,9 lt
—Average consumption10,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Isuzu MuSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
4135 mmLength4713 mm
1780 mmWidth1853 mm
1675 mmHeight1817 mm
—Weight2115 Kg
2330 mmWheelbase2745 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Isuzu Mu and 1998 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Isuzu Mu leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…