DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Land Rover Range Rover vs 1998 Isuzu Mu Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Isuzu Mu

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

61.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeIsuzu
Range RoverModelMu
1998Model year1998
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

14,3 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2771 cc
136 HPPower110 HP
270 NmTorque226 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
100 ltFuel tank83 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption—
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears4
235/70 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4713 mmLength4135 mm
1853 mmWidth1780 mm
1817 mmHeight1675 mm
2115 KgWeight—
2745 mmWheelbase2330 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Land Rover Range Rover and 1998 Isuzu Mu approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Isuzu Mu leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…