DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Isuzu Mu vs 1996 Dodge Caravan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Isuzu Mu

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

61.5–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

IsuzuMakeDodge
MuModelCaravan
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
4Seats7
3Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,6 s
0 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2771 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
110 HPPower116 HP
226 NmTorque262 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
83 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption11,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size215/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4135 mmLength4733 mm
1780 mmWidth1920 mm
1675 mmHeight1740 mm
—Weight1870 Kg
2330 mmWheelbase2878 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Isuzu Mu and 1996 Dodge Caravan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Isuzu Mu leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…