1996 • Dodge
Caravan
Dodge Caravan 2.5d (116 Hp) 1996Overall Score61.25/100
1996 Dodge Caravan vs 1996 Isuzu Mu Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Isuzu
Mu
Isuzu Mu 2.8 DT (110 HP) 1996Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Isuzu Mu
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
61.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Dodge CaravanSpecificationIsuzu Mu
DodgeMakeIsuzu
CaravanModelMu
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats4
5Doors3
Performance
Dodge CaravanSpecificationIsuzu Mu
12,6 s0–100 km/h—
175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2771 cc
116 HPPower110 HP
262 NmTorque226 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Dodge CaravanSpecificationIsuzu Mu
DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank83 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption—
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Dodge CaravanSpecificationIsuzu Mu
4733 mmLength4135 mm
1920 mmWidth1780 mm
1740 mmHeight1675 mm
1870 KgWeight—
2878 mmWheelbase2330 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Dodge Caravan and 1996 Isuzu Mu approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Isuzu Mu leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…