DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Audi 80 vs 1990 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationNissan AD
AudiMakeNissan
80ModelAD
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationNissan AD
13,7 s0–100 km/h—
174 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1974 cc
75 HPPower76 HP
140 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationNissan AD
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationNissan AD
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/70 R14Tyre size—

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationNissan AD
4393 mmLength4175 mm
1695 mmWidth1665 mm
1397 mmHeight1480 mm
1030 KgWeight—
2546 mmWheelbase2400 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Audi 80 and 1990 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…