1990 • Nissan
Bluebird
Nissan Bluebird 1.8i (88 Hp) 1990Overall Score51.5/100
1990 Nissan Bluebird vs 1990 Audi 80 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Audi
80
Audi 80 1.8 CAT (75 Hp) 1990Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Bluebird
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
51.5–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationAudi 80
NissanMakeAudi
BluebirdModel80
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationAudi 80
—0–100 km/h13,7 s
0 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1809 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
88 HPPower75 HP
142 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank68 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption—
—Average consumption7,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationAudi 80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size175/70 R14
Dimensions
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationAudi 80
4520 mmLength4393 mm
1690 mmWidth1695 mm
1375 mmHeight1397 mm
—Weight1030 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2546 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Nissan Bluebird and 1990 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…