DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Cadillac CTS vs 2003 Infiniti FX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Infiniti FX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeInfiniti
CTSModelFX
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

7,0 s0–100 km/h—
233 km/hTop speed221 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3498 cc
258 HPPower283 HP
346 NmTorque366 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank90 lt
16,2 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
225/50 R17Tyre size265/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4828 mmLength4803 mm
1793 mmWidth1925 mm
1440 mmHeight1674 mm
1722 KgWeight1960 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Cadillac CTS and 2003 Infiniti FX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Infiniti FX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…