DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Hyundai Verna vs 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Hyundai Verna

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

64.5–64.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HyundaiMakeMitsubishi
VernaModelLancer
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,7 s
0 km/hTop speed191 km/h
1591 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
123 HPPower117 HP
151 NmTorque154 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank59 lt
—Urban consumption7,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,8 lt
—Average consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—TransmissionManual
185/65 R15; 195/55 R16Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4440 mmLength4570 mm
1729 mmWidth1760 mm
1475 mmHeight1490 mm
—Weight1260 kg
—Luggage capacity430 lt
2600 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Mitsubishi LancerDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRain SensorLight SensorUSB PortBluetoothNavigation

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Hyundai Verna and 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Hyundai Verna leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…