2016 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max Trend 2016 1.6 125 HPOverall Score64.25/100
2016 Ford C-Max vs 2016 Hyundai Verna Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Hyundai
Verna
Hyundai Verna 1.6 16V (123 Hp) 2016Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Hyundai Verna
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
64.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationHyundai Verna
FordMakeHyundai
C-MaxModelVerna
2016Model year2016
MpvBody typeSedan
—Seats5
—Doors4
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationHyundai Verna
11,8 s0–100 km/h—
188 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1591 cc
125 HPPower123 HP
159 NmTorque151 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationHyundai Verna
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption—
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationHyundai Verna
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size185/65 R15; 195/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationHyundai Verna
4379 mmLength4440 mm
1858 mmWidth1729 mm
1610 mmHeight1475 mm
1374 kgWeight—
432 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2600 mm
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford C-Max and 2016 Hyundai Verna approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Hyundai Verna leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…