DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Acura RSX vs 2003 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura RSX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AcuraMakeLand Rover
RSXModelFreelander
2003Model year2003
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

6,7 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
214 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
203 HPPower177 HP
192 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears4
205/55 R16Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4374 mmLength4433 mm
1725 mmWidth1809 mm
1400 mmHeight1709 mm
1280 KgWeight1550 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Acura RSX and 2003 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura RSX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…