DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford C-Max vs 2003 Acura RSX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura RSX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford C-MaxSpecificationAcura RSX
FordMakeAcura
C-MaxModelRSX
2003Model year2003
MPVBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

Ford C-MaxSpecificationAcura RSX
9,6 s0–100 km/h6,7 s
200 km/hTop speed214 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
136 HPPower203 HP
320 NmTorque192 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford C-MaxSpecificationAcura RSX
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Ford C-MaxSpecificationAcura RSX
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford C-MaxSpecificationAcura RSX
4330 mmLength4374 mm
1820 mmWidth1725 mm
1600 mmHeight1400 mm
1391 KgWeight1280 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2570 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford C-Max and 2003 Acura RSX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura RSX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…