DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Acura RSX vs 2003 Ford C-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura RSX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Acura RSXSpecificationFord C-Max
AcuraMakeFord
RSXModelC-Max
2003Model year2003
CoupeBody typeMPV
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Acura RSXSpecificationFord C-Max
6,7 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
214 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
203 HPPower136 HP
192 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Acura RSXSpecificationFord C-Max
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
—Average consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Acura RSXSpecificationFord C-Max
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Acura RSXSpecificationFord C-Max
4374 mmLength4330 mm
1725 mmWidth1820 mm
1400 mmHeight1600 mm
1280 KgWeight1391 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Acura RSX and 2003 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura RSX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…