DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 AC ACE vs 1995 TVR Chimaera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

AC ACE

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

82.5–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AC ACESpecificationTVR Chimaera
ACMakeTVR
ACEModelChimaera
2000Model year1995
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

AC ACESpecificationTVR Chimaera
5,7 s0–100 km/h5,5 s
250 km/hTop speed271 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4997 cc
326 HPPower340 HP
427 NmTorque481 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

AC ACESpecificationTVR Chimaera
PetrolFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank57 lt
15,1 ltUrban consumption—
10,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

AC ACESpecificationTVR Chimaera
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/45 ZR17Tyre size235/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

AC ACESpecificationTVR Chimaera
4420 mmLength3965 mm
1870 mmWidth1730 mm
1300 mmHeight1223 mm
1510 KgWeight1060 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2282 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 AC ACE and 1995 TVR Chimaera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, AC ACE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…