DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Hyundai Matrix vs 2003 Citroen Xsara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Hyundai Matrix

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HyundaiMakeCitroen
MatrixModelXsara
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,7 s0–100 km/h15,8 s
170 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1599 ccEngine displacement1762 cc
103 HPPower101 HP
141 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank54 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption13 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4025 mmLength4167 mm
1740 mmWidth1698 mm
1635 mmHeight1405 mm
1323 KgWeight1070 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Hyundai Matrix and 2003 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Hyundai Matrix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…