DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Citroen Xsara vs 2003 Hyundai Matrix Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Hyundai Matrix

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeHyundai
XsaraModelMatrix
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

15,8 s0–100 km/h12,7 s
177 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1762 ccEngine displacement1599 cc
101 HPPower103 HP
153 NmTorque141 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank55 lt
13 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
—Average consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4167 mmLength4025 mm
1698 mmWidth1740 mm
1405 mmHeight1635 mm
1070 KgWeight1323 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Citroen Xsara and 2003 Hyundai Matrix approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Hyundai Matrix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…