1981 • Audi
200
Audi 200 2.1 5E (136 Hp) 1981Overall Score58.25/100
1981 Audi 200 vs 1984 Toyota Mark II Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1984 • Toyota
Mark II
Toyota Mark II 2.0i 24V (135 Hp) 1984Overall Score58.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Mark II
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 200SpecificationToyota Mark II
AudiMakeToyota
200ModelMark II
1981Model year1984
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Audi 200SpecificationToyota Mark II
10,8 s0–100 km/h—
188 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2144 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
136 HPPower135 HP
182 NmTorque177 Nm
5Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 200SpecificationToyota Mark II
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank65 lt
10,4 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 200SpecificationToyota Mark II
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size185/70 R14 S
Dimensions
Audi 200SpecificationToyota Mark II
4695 mmLength4690 mm
1768 mmWidth1690 mm
1390 mmHeight1475 mm
1260 KgWeight1280 Kg
2676 mmWheelbase2660 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1981 Audi 200 and 1984 Toyota Mark II approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Mark II leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…