DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1982 Ford Sierra vs 1981 Audi 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Sierra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford SierraSpecificationAudi 200
FordMakeAudi
SierraModel200
1982Model year1981
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Ford SierraSpecificationAudi 200
—0–100 km/h10,8 s
0 km/hTop speed188 km/h
2294 ccEngine displacement2144 cc
114 HPPower136 HP
176 NmTorque182 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Ford SierraSpecificationAudi 200
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Average consumption10,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford SierraSpecificationAudi 200
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/60 R15

Dimensions

Ford SierraSpecificationAudi 200
4425 mmLength4695 mm
1694 mmWidth1768 mm
1407 mmHeight1390 mm
—Weight1260 Kg
2608 mmWheelbase2676 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1982 Ford Sierra and 1981 Audi 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Sierra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…