E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1981 Audi 200 vs 1978 Saab 99 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 99

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 200SpecificationSaab 99
AudiMakeSaab
200Model99
1981Model year1978
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

Audi 200SpecificationSaab 99
10,8 s0–100 km/h—
188 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2144 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
136 HPPower107 HP
182 NmTorque161 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 200SpecificationSaab 99
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 200SpecificationSaab 99
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
205/60 R15Tyre size—

Dimensions

Audi 200SpecificationSaab 99
4695 mmLength4534 mm
1768 mmWidth1690 mm
1390 mmHeight1435 mm
1260 KgWeight1202 Kg
2676 mmWheelbase2477 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1981 Audi 200 and 1978 Saab 99 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 99 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1982 Ford SierraVS1981 Audi 200Ford Sierra vs Audi 2001982 and 1981 model years1983 Nissan MaximaVS1981 Audi 200Nissan Maxima vs Audi 2001983 and 1981 model yearsImage unavailableVS1981 Audi 200Toyota Mark II vs Audi 2001984 and 1981 model years1984 Opel MonzaVS1981 Audi 200Opel Monza vs Audi 2001984 and 1981 model years1978 Saab 99VS1981 Audi 200Saab 99 vs Audi 2001978 and 1981 model years

Comments are loading…