DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1981 Audi 200 vs 1982 Ford Sierra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Sierra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 200SpecificationFord Sierra
AudiMakeFord
200ModelSierra
1981Model year1982
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Audi 200SpecificationFord Sierra
10,8 s0–100 km/h—
188 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2144 ccEngine displacement2294 cc
136 HPPower114 HP
182 NmTorque176 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 200SpecificationFord Sierra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 200SpecificationFord Sierra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size—

Dimensions

Audi 200SpecificationFord Sierra
4695 mmLength4425 mm
1768 mmWidth1694 mm
1390 mmHeight1407 mm
1260 KgWeight—
2676 mmWheelbase2608 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1981 Audi 200 and 1982 Ford Sierra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Sierra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…