DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Acura RLX vs 2014 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AcuraMakeFord
RLXModelTaurus
2017Model year2014
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3500 ccEngine displacement3496 cc
310 HPPower365 HP
369 NmTorque475 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank72 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption11,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6 SelectShift
P245/45 R18; P245/40 R19Tyre size255/45 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4982 mmLength5154 mm
1890 mmWidth1935 mm
1465 mmHeight1542 mm
1784 KgWeight1970 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2868 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Acura RLX and 2014 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…