DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Ford Flex vs 2017 Acura RLX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Flex

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford FlexSpecificationAcura RLX
FordMakeAcura
FlexModelRLX
2014Model year2017
SUVBody typeSedan
6-7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Ford FlexSpecificationAcura RLX
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3496 ccEngine displacement3500 cc
364 HPPower310 HP
475 NmTorque369 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Ford FlexSpecificationAcura RLX
PetrolFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank70 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
13,1 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford FlexSpecificationAcura RLX
4x4Drivetrain—
6Gears6
235/60 R17Tyre sizeP245/45 R18; P245/40 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford FlexSpecificationAcura RLX
5130 mmLength4982 mm
1930 mmWidth1890 mm
1727 mmHeight1465 mm
—Weight1784 Kg
2995 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Ford Flex and 2017 Acura RLX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…