DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Acura RLX vs 2014 Ford Flex Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Flex

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Acura RLXSpecificationFord Flex
AcuraMakeFord
RLXModelFlex
2017Model year2014
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats6-7
4Doors5

Performance

Acura RLXSpecificationFord Flex
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3500 ccEngine displacement3496 cc
310 HPPower364 HP
369 NmTorque475 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Acura RLXSpecificationFord Flex
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank71 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption10,2 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Acura RLXSpecificationFord Flex
—Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
P245/45 R18; P245/40 R19Tyre size235/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Acura RLXSpecificationFord Flex
4982 mmLength5130 mm
1890 mmWidth1930 mm
1465 mmHeight1727 mm
1784 KgWeight—
2850 mmWheelbase2995 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Acura RLX and 2014 Ford Flex approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…