DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Honda WR-V vs 2017 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda WR-V

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeCitroen
WR-VModelC3
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeCrossover
5Seats—
5Doors—

Performance

—0–100 km/h14,9 s
0 km/hTop speed168 km/h
1199 ccEngine displacement1199 cc
90 HPPower82 HP
110 NmTorque118 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank42 lt
—Urban consumption5,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—TransmissionManual
195/60 R16Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3999 mmLength3996 mm
1734 mmWidth1749 mm
1601 mmHeight1490 mm
1087-1104 KgWeight980 kg
—Luggage capacity300 lt
2555 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Honda WR-V

No additional feature records are available.

Citroen C3Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsRear Parking SensorsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Honda WR-V and 2017 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda WR-V leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…