DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Honda Stepwgn vs 2006 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Stepwgn

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeLand Rover
StepwgnModelFreelander
2006Model year2006
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
8Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,1 s
0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2354 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
162 HPPower177 HP
220 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption17,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,7 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
195/65 R15Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4670 mmLength4433 mm
1695 mmWidth1809 mm
1845 mmHeight1709 mm
1570 KgWeight1550 Kg
2805 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Honda Stepwgn and 2006 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Stepwgn leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…