1996 • Honda
Sm-x
Honda Sm-x 2.0 i 16V (140 Hp) 1996Overall Score62.25/100
1996 Honda Sm-x vs 1996 Honda Shuttle Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Honda
Shuttle
Honda Shuttle 2.3 16V (150 Hp) 1996Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Honda Sm-x
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Honda Sm-xSpecificationHonda Shuttle
HondaMakeHonda
Sm-xModelShuttle
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody type—
4Seats—
4Doors—
Performance
Honda Sm-xSpecificationHonda Shuttle
160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1973 ccEngine displacement2155 cc
140 HPPower150 HP
186 NmTorque198 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Honda Sm-xSpecificationHonda Shuttle
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank0 lt
8,62 ltUrban consumption—
5,35 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Honda Sm-xSpecificationHonda Shuttle
3935 mmLength—
1695 mmWidth—
1735 mmHeight—
1370 KgWeight—
2500 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Honda Sm-x and 1996 Honda Shuttle approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Honda Sm-x leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailablePeugeot 605 vs Honda Sm-x1996 and 1996 model years
VSImage unavailableVolvo 850 vs Honda Sm-x1996 and 1996 model years
VSImage unavailableCitroen Xantia vs Honda Sm-x1996 and 1996 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableCitroen XM vs Honda Sm-x1996 and 1996 model years
VSImage unavailableAlfa Romeo 145 vs Honda Sm-x1996 and 1996 model yearsComments are loading…