2005 • Honda
S2000
Honda S2000 2.2 (242 Hp) 2005Overall Score71.5/100
2005 Honda S2000 vs 2003 Volvo C70 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Volvo
C70
Volvo C70 2.3 i 20V T5 (245 Hp) 2003Overall Score70.75/100
WINNER
Honda S2000
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Honda S2000SpecificationVolvo C70
HondaMakeVolvo
S2000ModelC70
2005Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2Seats4
2Doors2
Performance
Honda S2000SpecificationVolvo C70
6,2 s0–100 km/h7,5 s
240 km/hTop speed240 km/h
2157 ccEngine displacement2319 cc
242 HPPower245 HP
221 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Honda S2000SpecificationVolvo C70
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank68 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption13,6 lt
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
9,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Honda S2000SpecificationVolvo C70
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
Front tyres: 215/45 R17, Rear tyres: 245/40 R17Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Honda S2000SpecificationVolvo C70
4135 mmLength4716 mm
1750 mmWidth1817 mm
1285 mmHeight1429 mm
1250 KgWeight1580 Kg
2400 mmWheelbase2660 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Honda S2000 and 2003 Volvo C70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Honda S2000 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…