DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Honda S2000 vs 2004 Seat Altea Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda S2000

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeSeat
S2000ModelAltea
2003Model year2004
CabrioletBody typeMinivan
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

6,2 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
240 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
240 HPPower170 HP
208 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
9,9 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
Front tyres: 215/45 R17 89W, Rear tyres: 245/40 R17 92WTyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4135 mmLength4325 mm
1750 mmWidth1768 mm
1270 mmHeight1568 mm
1270 KgWeight1446 Kg
2400 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Honda S2000 and 2004 Seat Altea approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda S2000 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…