2003 • Mazda
Atenza
Mazda Atenza 2.3 i 16V (178 Hp) 2003Overall Score69.25/100
2003 Mazda Atenza vs 2003 Honda S2000 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Honda
S2000
Honda S2000 2.0 (240 Hp) 2003Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Atenza
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationHonda S2000
MazdaMakeHonda
AtenzaModelS2000
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2
Performance
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationHonda S2000
—0–100 km/h6,2 s
180 km/hTop speed240 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
178 HPPower240 HP
216 NmTorque208 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationHonda S2000
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption13,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,9 lt
—Average consumption9,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationHonda S2000
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
195/65 R15 91 HTyre sizeFront tyres: 215/45 R17 89W, Rear tyres: 245/40 R17 92W
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda AtenzaSpecificationHonda S2000
4745 mmLength4135 mm
1780 mmWidth1750 mm
1440 mmHeight1270 mm
1340 KgWeight1270 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2400 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Mazda Atenza and 2003 Honda S2000 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Atenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…