2003 • Honda
S2000
Honda S2000 2.0 (240 Hp) 2003Overall Score68.5/100
2003 Honda S2000 vs 2003 Mazda Atenza Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Mazda
Atenza
Mazda Atenza 2.3 i 16V (178 Hp) 2003Overall Score69.25/100
WINNER
Mazda Atenza
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Honda S2000SpecificationMazda Atenza
HondaMakeMazda
S2000ModelAtenza
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Honda S2000SpecificationMazda Atenza
6,2 s0–100 km/h—
240 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
240 HPPower178 HP
208 NmTorque216 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Honda S2000SpecificationMazda Atenza
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank64 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption—
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Honda S2000SpecificationMazda Atenza
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
Front tyres: 215/45 R17 89W, Rear tyres: 245/40 R17 92WTyre size195/65 R15 91 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Honda S2000SpecificationMazda Atenza
4135 mmLength4745 mm
1750 mmWidth1780 mm
1270 mmHeight1440 mm
1270 KgWeight1340 Kg
2400 mmWheelbase2675 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Honda S2000 and 2003 Mazda Atenza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Atenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…