DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Honda Ridgeline vs 2014 BMW X6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW X6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeBMW
RidgelineModelX6
2017Model year2014
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5Seats4/5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,5 s
0 km/hTop speed222 km/h
3471 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
280 HPPower245 HP
355 NmTorque540 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
74 ltFuel tank85 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
9,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
10,7 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears8 Steptronic
245/60 R18Tyre size255/50 R19 107V XL
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5334 mmLength4877 mm
1996 mmWidth1983 mm
1783 mmHeight1690 mm
1924-1932 KgWeight2075 Kg
3180 mmWheelbase2933 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Honda Ridgeline and 2014 BMW X6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW X6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…