DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 BMW X6 vs 2017 Honda Ridgeline Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW X6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeHonda
X6ModelRidgeline
2014Model year2017
SUVBody typePick-up
4/5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

7,5 s0–100 km/h—
222 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement3471 cc
245 HPPower280 HP
540 NmTorque355 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank74 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,0 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
8 SteptronicGears6
255/50 R19 107V XLTyre size245/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4877 mmLength5334 mm
1983 mmWidth1996 mm
1690 mmHeight1783 mm
2075 KgWeight1924-1932 Kg
2933 mmWheelbase3180 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 BMW X6 and 2017 Honda Ridgeline approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW X6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…