DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Rover 400 vs 1994 Audi 100 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 400

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 100
RoverMakeAudi
400Model100
1994Model year1994
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 100
8,7 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
200 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
136 HPPower137 HP
185 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 100
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption11,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
8 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 100
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15 VTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 400SpecificationAudi 100
4365 mmLength4790 mm
1680 mmWidth1777 mm
1390 mmHeight1440 mm
1210 KgWeight1375 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2687 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Rover 400 and 1994 Audi 100 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…