DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Honda Logo vs 2002 Holden Cruze Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Cruze

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeHolden
LogoModelCruze
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1343 ccEngine displacement1490 cc
65 HPPower100 HP
108 NmTorque138 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank41 lt
8 ltUrban consumption7,2 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
175/70R13Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3785 mmLength3625 mm
1645 mmWidth1640 mm
1520 mmHeight1605 mm
790 KgWeight1000 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Honda Logo and 2002 Holden Cruze approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Cruze leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…