2002 • Holden
Cruze
Holden Cruze 1.5i 16V (100 Hp) 2002Overall Score56.5/100
2002 Holden Cruze vs 2002 Honda Logo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Honda
Logo
Honda Logo 1.3 (65 Hp) 2002Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Holden Cruze
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Holden CruzeSpecificationHonda Logo
HoldenMakeHonda
CruzeModelLogo
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5
Performance
Holden CruzeSpecificationHonda Logo
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1490 ccEngine displacement1343 cc
100 HPPower65 HP
138 NmTorque108 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Holden CruzeSpecificationHonda Logo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
41 ltFuel tank40 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption8 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
—Average consumption7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Holden CruzeSpecificationHonda Logo
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size175/70R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Holden CruzeSpecificationHonda Logo
3625 mmLength3785 mm
1640 mmWidth1645 mm
1605 mmHeight1520 mm
1000 KgWeight790 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2360 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Holden Cruze and 2002 Honda Logo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden Cruze leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…